Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Bonne Maman - the definitive rankings

So, we sat down (on two separate nights, because this is too large a task for one sitting) to compare all the 24 Bonne Maman advent calendar spreads.  For some of them it was pretty hard to discern a flavor (except "sweet" - memories of Valerie Martin's sweet tooth when she was our exchange student in the 80s remind me that French things that aren't salty do tend towards the syrupy - there was a notable absence of Marmalades in this collection), but it probably didn't help that the delivery system we were using was my patented many-flour grain-free bread, toasted, with Miyoko's dairy free "butter".  


Perhaps a plain cracker would have been better.  Be that as it may... drumroll... THE RANKINGS:

As you can see, the simple classics scored the best (we ranked before we looked to see what it was, which required putting on powerful readers, because the script is tiny and curly), which is perhaps unsurprising.  I'm glad we did it, it made my December, but we don't need to do it again.  Next year, tiny liquor bottles?  They are lovely little jars, though, and the attention to detail is great - each jar has a little picture of the main ingredient on a sticker that gets ripped when you open it.



An alternative view.

2024's Film-watching summary


2023 - Hit Man
2023 - The Holdovers
2023 - Godzilla Minus One
2023 - Dream Scenario
2023 - Robot Dreams (wonderful, but I didn't review it because it's a Frederick film)
2022 - Everything Everywhere All At Once
2022 - Bodies Bodies Bodies
2021 - The Worst Person in the World
2016 - The Nice Guys
2014 - The Fool
2014 - Predestination
2007 - Eastern Promises
2007 - Timecrimes
2004 - Primer
1994 - Cabin Boy
1990 - Close-Up
1987 - Where is the friend's house?
1987 - The Hidden
1975 - Barry Lyndon
1974 - The Living Dead at Manchester Morgue
1961 - Il Posto (The Job)
1961 - Viridiana
1960 - L'Avventura
1960 - Midnight Lace
1959 - Floating Weeds
1959 - Fires On The Plain
1958 - Ivan the Terrible, Part II
1955 - Pather Panchali
1955 - Richard III
1952 - Forbidden Games
1947 - The Lost Moment
1945 - Christmas in Connecticut
1944 - The Uninvited
1942 - I Married a Witch
1941 - Nous Les Gosses
1939 - The Roaring Twenties
1938 - Alexander Nevsky
1938 - Angels with Dirty Faces
1933 - King Kong
1931 - À Nous La Liberté
1924 - The Hands of Orlac 
1921 - The Indian Tomb

Well, this year, while a horrible anus in other respects, was a definite improvement on last in quantity of films watched - I see we hit every decade from the 1920s to the 2020s. We made a concerted effort to finish our 50 Years of Janus Films/Essential Art House box set (falling only 5 short), and it was in there that we found many of this year's gems (Il Posto, Forbidden Games, Fires on the Plain and Floating Weeds were unexpected highlights).  I see we also saw a fair number of films from the 2020's, of which the standout was probably The Holdovers (for me) or Everything Everywhere (for Jami).  Definitely the most obscure (at least, these days) film had to be The Indian Tomb, which I enjoyed more than I expected, but will not feel the need to revisit soon.  Unlike previous years, we didn't binge on any particular person's filmography, something that The Criterion Channel makes easier - so perhaps that a sign that we should re-subscribe.  But let's finish that box set first!

Previous Years' Summaries:
2023
2022
2021
2020

Film review: Floating Weeds (1959)


Another of the last few of our 50-film Criterion assortment, and at this point there's always a reason why we've put them off.  In this case it's because it's a two-hour Ozu film, and, while I respect Ozu (we've watched Tokyo Story and Good Morning before), I tend to find them a bit slow.  But this one's probably my favorite of the three, and, I would say, very accessible (perhaps even more so than the fart-joke-filled Good Morning, probably because there's more of a plot).  People often compare Wes Anderson to Ozu, as both are fond of immobile cameras directed at precisely arranged shots within which the actors move about (or, more often, don't).  As this is one of Ozu's late color works, there is also the similarity that they like colors that really pop, so each frame is a postcard.  However, the auteur I was most reminded of was Jacques Tati, perhaps (as Jami pointed out) because of the light, jaunty score.  

The main plot is simplicity itself: a rather shabby traveling troupe of actors is visiting a seaside town.  The "Master" (everyone calls him that) of the troupe has an extra reason to be glad to be in what is otherwise rather a dead-end and unpromising destination, because he has an old lover there (who runs a bar/noodle restaurant, albeit a very low-key one that never seems to have more than one punter, and seems to be run out of the front room of her house) 


and a now-teenaged son, who knows him only as "uncle" (his mother has told him that his son died when he was a baby) and whose education he has secretly been funding.  He is delighted to find how smart the boy (Kiyoshi) has turned out to be (almost too smart - he easily beats his father/"uncle" at a board game (that didn't look like either Go or Chess) and is rather contemptuous of his acting).  Also delighted is his old lover, who doesn't expect anything from him but to drink sake with her and watch the rain, although she does gently hint that maybe he should settle down.  Complicating matters is the fact that the Master has not told any of his troupe that he has this son and is rather secretive.  Also, their play is a flop, playing to rapidly diminishing houses, and suddenly their manager has gone missing.  A woman, who is certainly younger than the decidedly middle-aged Master, but significantly older than Kiyoshi, Sumiko, certainly regards herself as the Master's lover and becomes suspicious of his absences.  She manages to winkle out of one of the older members of the troupe that the Master has an old lover in town and when she comes to watch the show, she is pointed out to Sumiko.  She goes there when the Master is visiting and creates a scene, almost revealing Kiyoshi's real parentage to him.  The Master drags her away and gives her a savage dressing down in an extended scene where they shout at each other while sheltering on opposite sides of a street in the pouring rain, 


and the Master thinks the issue is closed.  However, Sumiko (whom he has called a slut, and accused of being a prostitute when he met her) has other plans.  She bribes 


Kayo, a much younger, attractive female member of the troupe (who is the daughter of a great actor who used to be in the troupe, but died) to seduce Kiyoshi, and she accepts, finding the boy at his part-time job at the telegraph office.  (She gives him a telegraph that says "Meet me outside" and tells him that it's addressed to him.  


She is successful, but then of course she falls for him in reality (he's a definite dish in his own right) 


and tries to push him away because she's not good enough for him.  However, she repeated fails, until they eventually make a half-hearted attempt to elope, until again, her conscience (at pulling him away from his schooling) gets the better of her.

Meanwhile other members of the troupe have subplots, notably three none-too-bright actors who loaf around town, in bars (when they have money) or on the beach (when they don't) picking up the town trollops.  


In one late scene two of their number suggest making a break for it, taking as much of the Master's money with them as they can, until the third indignantly talks them out of it, making them feel very ashamed in the process.  


And then, of course, the next day comes around and that third actor has done a runner with as many valuables as he could lay his hands on, and the Master is forced to sell whatever's left to buy train tickets out of there, and the troupe is forced to disband.  For a moment this looks like the time when the Master will finally settle down with his family and disclose to his son that he's his father, an idea that makes his old lover light up.  However, they then realize that Kiyoshi and Kayo have eloped (the Master has already seen them together 


and found out the truth about Sumiko's treachery and kicked her out of the troupe even before the theft).  Will he settle down?  Will Kiyoshi comes back, as his mother thinks, or is he too much like his father, as his father thinks?  What will become of Kayo?  What will become of Sumiko, who really does love the Master, it's just that jealousy gets the better of her? 

Well, watch it and see: it starts slowly, but the last hour fairly races by, and it's that rare combination of engrossing soapy story delivered in a beautiful art film package.  Definitely deserved to have been seen a lot earlier than film #45 of 50.

Monday, December 30, 2024

Shingles?!?

I've had an upset stomach for a couple of days now, and earlier today I noticed that the skin on my stomach felt tender, and then when I looked I saw livid red marks, but only one one side.  Jami did some googling and said it could be shingles, so I went to Urgent Care, and guess what?  It's shingles!  Whatever next!  Fortunately I caught the pharmacist before it closed, and if I caught it early enough I won't get permanent nerve damage...


Sunday, December 29, 2024

Film review: The Hands of Orlac (1924)


Well this was not what I expected.  I bought it a while back when we were going through a Conrad Weidt phase (along with The Man Who Laughs, which proved to be unplayable) and I thought I knew the plot from the films that have drawn influence from it over the years.  For our purposes, the most important of these was a film called Body Parts that we saw in previews in Los Angeles (that is, we were given a free pass on the condition that we filled in a questionnaire about it afterwards so they could decide what changes to be made before releasing it) that was both terrible and wonderful.  In Body Parts a man gets the hands of a convicted serial killer and becomes convinced that the evil in them is infecting him.  This idea comes directly from The Hands of Orlac (or, more precisely, from the novel on which it is based) but the film (in my opinion) wimps out, or rather, tries to be relatively realistic (for a film that portrays successful hand transplantation in France in the early 1920's).  Anyway, the basic plot is that Paul Orlac, famous concert pianist, is returning by train to his loving wife (to whom he has written of his wish to run his hands across her trembling hair and skin in a Simpsons-esque foreshadowing) when it derails.  Boldly she races aboard to rescue him and he is carried off.  Meanwhile, we see a sinister figure stalking the scene.  The good news is that he just has a slight skull fracture which is easily fixed.  The bad news is that his hands are crushed beyond repair.  This sends his wife (whose acting, perhaps most of an extreme bunch, cannot be over-the-topped) into a swooning fit, screeching "his hands are his life!!!!"  


When Orlac awakes the wife comes to smooch him 


and we get some troubling indication that his mind may be going because he thinks he sees a face leering at him through the window in his room's door (the same one that has appeared to him in a dream), 


but when the wife turns to look there is nothing.  Anyway, she goes back home and he is given some time to recuperate, at which point the doctor breaks it to him that he now has the hands of the recently executed murderer Vasseur.  Orlac is, I would say, less than grateful, given the alternative and the extent of this medical achievement, but as he discovers he can no longer play the piano (I was half hoping the hands would only play "Chopsticks" or something like that - in some possible world there's a Young Frankenstein version where this happens) and will soon be destitute, you can see his point.  There's some shenanigans of the maid writing to somebody that she cannot obey his terrible orders any more, Vasseur's infamous murder weapon (a knife with an X on the hilt) turning up in Orlac's door, and Orlac becoming more and more obsessed with the idea of the evil of the hands infecting his soul.  Sidenote: the real strength of this film, as you'd expect from a product of German Expressionism, is the lighting and the sets.  Orlac's house, in particular, is fantastic, with bizarre furniture, a huge door and a very bizarre lamp on the wall.  


Even more so is Orlac's father's house, which we see when first the wife and then (at her urging) Orlac himself go to him to beg him for money.  But no luck for the wife because, as the father says with relish, "I hate him!"  Orlac is reluctant to go himself, because the feeling is mutual ("he's EVIL!"), but when he does, we see him go in... then come running out and head straight for the police, because his father is lying dead with Vasseur's dagger in his chest.  


Moreover (as the detectives announce after merely peering around with a magnifying glass, which shows great eyesight and memory) Vasseur's fingerprints are everywhere, including the murder weapon.  This, of course, bemuses the cops (if not Paul) because they've executed Vasseur.  Paul races home to look in the piano, which was where he hid the knife when he found it in the door, and it's gone!  Did he kill his own father in some kind of psychotic fugue?  Well, he's out in the street when a sinister figure approaches him - and it's the man with the face he saw through his hospital room's door!  The man takes him to a bar 


and demands that he pay him a sizeable chunk of the money that will now be coming to him from his rich dead father for staying quiet about the fact that he, Paul Orlac, has Vasseur's hands.  "And I know this because I am Vasseur!" says the man, who appears to have metal prosthetic hands, "at least, his head" (here he reveals a livid scar on his neck) "because the doctor's assistant performed the same trick on the head that the doctor performed on the hands!"  Anyway, Orlac promises to pay the man tomorrow, but goes to his wife and spills his guts and she tells him to go to the cops... and they believe him!  So they turn up to arrest the strange man, and it turns out (a) they've been after him for a while, (b) he's the doctor's assistant, and (c) the metal hands are fake, concealing his real hands.  Then the maid shows up and reveals (d) the fingerprints were planted by this criminal because he knew Vasseur, took molds of his fingers and created fake fingerprints that he attached to gloves (that she produces).  Finally, (e) it was he and not Vasseur who committed the murder (of a money lender) for which Vasseur was wrongly convicted and executed!  At this Paul realizes his hands are innocent, too, and there's no danger of them turning him evil, so his wife finally gets the long-promised caresses.  As I said, a bit of a silly cop out.  I'd prefer ludicrous superstitious evil-in-the-flesh nonsense (which is what it sounds like the novel is, and Body Parts certainly is) than this, (undeniably entertaining) ludicrous criminal plot nonsense.  But, as always, Weidt is worth the price of admission: you'll never see more expressive hand acting, I guarantee it!

Pissing down at Seven Lakes



Saturday, December 28, 2024

Film review: Richard III (1955)


Only 7 films remain unwatched (well, now 6) in our 50 film Criterion set, and Jami picked this one to watch first.  It would have been my last choice, but it turns out pretty entertaining (although, given its extreme length, we watched it over two nights). It's a bit jarring, at first - the colors are very technicolor, and the costumes look more like a Danny Kaye production than (say) the much more realistically grimy first season of Blackadder, but it's all about the fantastic performances.  And what a murderer's row of a cast!  Obviously Olivier (although his Richard is not nearly the caricature that familiarity with Peter Sellers' "Hard Days Night" bit would lead one to believe), but Gielgud!  Richardson!  Claire Bloom!  


And a steady stream of "oh, that guy!" character actors, from Patrick Troughton in a tiny role as Tyrell, to the pairing of Michael "The Celestial Toymaker" Gough and Michael "the chauffeur from Butterflies" Ripper as the two murderers.  


I must confess to being unfamiliar with the play (apart from the opening "Now is the Winter..." monologue and the ending "My kingdom for a horse" scene) and the machinations were a bit bewildering.  And I have to wonder if some parts were severely truncated, as there's a scene before the climactic battle (which is rousingly handled, even if it looks a lot less like Salisbury and a lot more like Southern California) when messengers keep rushing up to Richard with new bulletins to a laughable extreme, but nonetheless the delivery of the lines and the inventive staging 


kept both of us pretty rapt.  Particularly entertaining is when Richard (with the help of Richardson's Buckingham) 


feigns unwillingness to accept the crown and affects to be found praying between two clergymen.  Olivier manages both to play up the comedy while being convincingly evil (and there are chilling moments in the film to pair with the comedic - a standout one is when everyone but Hastings (played by Alec Clunes, who was at the time a leading stage actor) realizes that he's doomed, and moves to the other end of the table from him), 


and this despite his ridiculous getup 


(and very spindly legs in those unforgiving tights).  The man knew how to bring the bard to the masses, that's for sure.

Balmy weather at Holly Rec

No parkas required as Frederick models his new Blundstones.