Sunday, April 5, 2026

Film review: La Tête d'un homme (1933)


This is supposed to be one of the better cinematic Maigret adaptations and, while interesting in parts, and no doubt well-directed (Julien Duvivier directed Pépé le Moko, the proto-Casablanca in our Criterion box set, and there are very German-expressionistic passages, including one where a tall lumbering man stalks through a landscape terrorizing children in a manner that I would be amazed if it was not a reference to Frankenstein), reminded me of why I always give up on Simenon.  He manages to do police procedurals that are entirely lacking in suspense.  This one was Columbo-esque, in that, while you didn't see the killer commit the crime, it was pretty much obvious who the killer was right from the early going, and no serious alternatives were ever offered.  And yet, while there were moments where Maigret circled the killer, if anything the killer had the upper hand throughout, and, as he was dying of tuberculosis, didn't really have much to lose.  In brief, the prodigal nephew ("Willy") 


of a rich American aunt is overheard in his favorite bar saying to his fiancée (not his girlfriend, who warns him (correctly) that his fiancée is soaking him) that he would pay $10K francs to bump off the aunt so he could inherit (and pay off his exorbitant bar tab).  Very shortly thereafter a person says "hey, you dropped this" and hands him a note that offers to take him up on the suggestion, which he reads and stuffs into his pocket guiltily.  But he has not escaped the beady eyes of his intended and she stealthily extracts the note and reads it too.  She then scans the bar to see if she can work out who wrote it, to no avail.

Next, we see a tall, rather simple-seeming man show up at a large house and sneak upstairs, into a bedroom, where he is startled to bump into a bloody (this film is not bound by the Hays code) corpse of the aunt.  He is horrified and, being a dumb klutz, smears bloody hand-and-foot-prints everywhere.  Then another man appears, 


who clearly hired the other (and who is wearing gloves and little cloth booties over his shoes) and says he found the aunt like this and the other (who had clearly been told simply to get money from the bedroom) should get going and he'll clean up the prints.  Well tall-and-stupid gets going but the other one just waits a beat, lights a Gaulois, leaves all the prints and saunters off.  The tall man heads off to a country town called Nancy to lie low hiding in his parents' barn, while the other (who is a rather Asian looking actor playing a Czech student called Radek, but is actually Russian - got all that?) goes back to the bar.  The tall man is soon caught and questioned by Maigret, 


who is alone in believing his protestations of innocence, and arranges a risky stunt where they pretend to break down when ferrying him to a prison and one of the cops slips a note to him to run while everyone's looking at the engine.  Then Maigret has him tailed, and he leads them to the bar where Radek hangs out.  From this point on Maigret has decided that Radek is the killer, but Radek knows he can't prove it and rubs Maigret's face in it.  


Meanwhile Maigret's boss is convinced that the tall guy is the killer, and when he gets away, threatens Maigret and takes him off the case.  Anyway, it all builds to a head and Radek alternates between smug arrogance, tortured pawing of first a prostitute and then Willy's fiancée, 


longing for an unseen Piaf-like singer in the apartment across the hall, and angry ranting about rich people having the life he deserves.  It's not that long of a film but it does drag rather, and is, as to be expected from Simenon, more a character study than a thriller.  Still, I was sad when one of Maigret's cheerful young assistants bites it, which seemed a bit uncalled for, although Radek certainly gets his just deserts 


(and redeems himself a bit by exonerating the big lug with his dying breath.  All in all, a well-made if not especially enjoyable film.  Still, not as extreme in either direction as another Simenon adaptation I regret watching called M. Hire, which may be the most depressing film I've ever seen.  Odd that Maigret is such a content, placid individual when his author has such a jaded view of the world.

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Summary of Criterion Box Set - Essential Art House, 50 Years of Janus Films

Regular readers (should such things exist) will have picked up that a fair proportion of the films we watch have come from a box set we bought many moons ago (I just checked and apparently I bought it in 2006 for $625 - it's a bit more now) - so many that they're all DVDs, not Blu-Rays, let alone 4K - and have worked through on and off for two decades.  Well, we finally finished all 50 films.  I say "we" but I lost Jami in the last furlong, as she can't take anything remotely gloomy these days.  Anyhoo, here are some photos:









As you can see, it comes in a (now slightly tatty) case and consists of a large book to contain the 51 discs (there's also a disc of three documentaries - about Paul Robeson, "The Love Goddesses" and "The Great Chase" - lots of clips taken from classic silents involving Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd, the Keystone Kops et al.) and a thinner volume which has gorgeous glossy photographs along with a mini-essay about each film.  The actual discs, while very high quality to view (some of them you wouldn't know weren't Blu-Ray) have no extras and rudimentary menus, but all have subtitles, mostly because the majority aren't in English.  You might notice that the Seven Samurai disk above doesn't have the same typeface because I lent it out and it vanished, so I got the Criterion DVD edition to make sure the collection is complete (this despite the fact that we own it on Blu-Ray and I have to stop myself buying it on 4K every time Criterion has a 50% off sale).  Anyway, let's start by listing the contents in chronological order, complete with length and director:

1922 - Häxan (Benjamin Christensen, 1hr 44m)
1929 - Pandora's Box (G.W. Pabst, 2hr 13m)
1931 - M (Fritz Lang, 1hr 50m)
1935 - The 39 Steps (Alfred Hitchcock, 1hr 26m)
1937 - Pépé le Moko (Julien Duvivier, 1hr 34m)
1937 - Grand Illusion (Jean Renoir, 1hr 54m)
1938 - Pygmalion (Anthony Asquith, 1hr 30m)
1938 - The Lady Vanishes (Hitchcock, 1hr 37m)
1938 - Alexander Nevsky (Sergei Eisenstein, 1hr 48m)
1939 - The Rules of the Game (Renoir, 1hr 46m)
1939 - Le Jour Se Lève (Marcel Carné, 1hr 30m)
1943 - The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (Michael Powell, 2hrs 43m)
1945 - Brief Encounter (David Lean, 1hr 26m)
1946 - Beauty and the Beast (Jean Cocteau, 1hr 33m)
1948 - The Fallen Idol (Carol Reed, 1hr 35m)
1949 - The Third Man (Reed, 1hr 44m)
1949 - Kind Hearts and Coronets (Robert Hamer, 1hr 46m)
1950 - Rashomon (Akira Kurosawa, 1hr 28m)
1951 - Miss Julie (Alf Sjöberg, 1hr 30m)
1952 - Ikiru (Kurosawa, 2hrs 23m)
1952 - The Importance of Being Earnest (Asquith, 1hr 35m)
1952 - Forbidden Games (René Clément, 1hr 25m)
1952 - Umberto D (Vittorio de Sica, 1hr 29m)
1952 - The White Sheik (Federico Fellini, 1hr 26m)
1953 - The Wages of Fear (Henri-Georges Clouzot, 2hrs 27m)
1953 - Ugetsu (Kenji Mizoguchi, 1hr 37m)
1953 - M. Hulot's Holiday (Jacques Tati, 1hr 27m)
1954 - Seven Samurai (Kurosawa, 3hrs 27m)
1954 - La Strada (Fellini, 1hr 48m)
1955 - Richard III (Laurence Olivier, 2hr 38m)
1955 - Summertime (Lean, 1hr 40m)
1957 - The Seventh Seal (Ingmar Bergman, 1hr 36m)
1957 - Wild Strawberries (Bergman, 1hr 31m)
1958 - Ashes and Diamonds (Andrzej Wajda, 1hr 43m)
1958 - Ivan the Terrible Part II (Eisenstein, 1hr 25m)
1959 - Ballad of a Soldier (Grigori Chukhrai, 1hr 28m)
1959 - Black Orpheus (Marcel Camus, 1hr 47m)
1959 - Fires on the Plain (Kon Ichikawa, 1hr 44m)
1959 - Floating Weeds (Yasujiro Ozu, 2hrs)
1959 - The 400 Blows (François Truffaut, 1hr 39m)
1960 - L'Avventura (Michelangelo Antonioni, 2hrs 23m)
1960 - The Virgin Spring (Bergman, 1hr 29m)
1961 - Il Posto (Ermanno Olmi, 1hr 33m)
1961 - Viridiana (Luis Buñuel, 1hr 31m)
1962 - Jules and Jim (Truffaut, 1hr, 45m)
1962 - Knife in the Water (Roman Polanski, 1hr 34m)
1965 - Fists in the Pocket (Marco Bellocchio, 1hr 48m)
1965 - Loves of a Blonde (Miloš Forman, 1hr 25m)
1973 - The Spirit of the Beehive (Victor Erice, 1hr 39m)

While there are some undeniable gold-star classics in there, and most great directors get at least one entry (and in Kurosawa's and Bergman's case, three), this is in some ways an odd selection.  I'm no Godard fan but surely Breathless at least deserves to be here? And where are F.W. Murnau, Tarkovsky, Agnes Varda, Robert Bresson, Carl Theodor Dreyer, Jacques Demy, Alain Resnais, Pasolini, Fassbinder, Melville, and many more?  No Battle of Algiers?  No El Verdugo? Nothing from the British Kitchen Sink dramas?  And some of the films chosen for well-known directors are a little odd: The White Sheik over  or La Dolce VitaFloating Weeds over Tokyo StoryThe Virgin Spring over Persona?  Le Jour Se Lève over Children of Paradise?  Umberto D over Bicycle ThievesIl Posto over The Tree of Wooden ClogsHulot over Playtime?  Having said that, I prefer all but Jour and Virgin Spring of the lesser films in that list, so...  And no doubt the explanation has more to do with what films they could secure the rights to (or that Janus Films happened to release in the US) than pure quality.  It's interesting how the 50s comprises about half of all the films (not that I'm complaining: I think of the 50s as a weak decade for films, but that's only Hollywood.  The number of immortal classics included here is stunning) so perhaps that was the peak of Janus's operating period.

You can get an idea of how many films we saw before I started blogging films we watched (2020) - they're the ones without links above. Anyway, on to some lists.  

Films I almost certainly saw before we owned this set
39 Steps, Lady Vanishes, Third Man, Kind Hearts, Wages of Fear, Hulot, Seven Samurai, Seventh Seal

Now some lists of ten, in chronological order.

Absolute Stone-Cold Unmissable (you cannot die without seeing them) Classics
M
Grand Illusion
Beauty and the Beast
Rashomon
Ugetsu
Seven Samurai
La Strada
The Seventh Seal
The 400 Blows
L'Avventura 
 

Top Entertainment (you don't have to be a cinephile)
The 39 Steps
The Lady Vanishes
Pygmalion
The Fallen Idol
Kind Hearts and Coronets
The Importance of Being Earnest 
The White Sheik
The Wages of Fear
M. Hulot's Holiday
Seven Samurai

Gems in the collection that I would never have seen otherwise
The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (it's a whopper, but a classic)
Brief Encounter
(very famous, but it was my Grandma's favorite, which put me off, silly me)
Beauty and the Beast
The Fallen Idol
Forbidden Games 
(just a jewel of a film)
The White Sheik (my favorite Fellini that I've seen, although undoubtedly not among his greatest)
Ballad of a Soldier (apparently this film is legendary in the former USSR)
Fires on the Plain
Il Posto 
(probably my fave of the films I'd not heard of)
The Spirit of the Beehive

Films that I didn't love but that have indelible images
Häxan
Alexander Nevsky (amazing battle scene)
Richard III (likewise)
Ashes and Diamonds (upside down Christ)
Ivan the Terrible Part II
Black Orpheus (just Rio and environs)
Viridiana (a feast)
Fists in the Pocket 

Overall: while there are some I won't be revisiting (hello Miss JuliePandora's Box) these are actually few and far between.  It's like the books you were forced to read in school that leave deep impressions even if you didn't love them at the time.  So if you haven't seen the majority of this collection, and come across a second hand copy (make me an offer), you absolutely have to buy it.  In the mood for an action flick?  The Seven Samurai is the best one ever made.  Want an achingly romantic love story?  Brief Encounter.  Want a film that will have you holding your breath for an hour straight?  The Wages of Fear.  Want the grimmest anti-war film outside of Come and See? Fires on the Plain is for you.  Want to see the breakthrough films of the directors of  Chinatown and Amadeus?  Knife in the Water and Loves of a Blonde.  Want a better version of My Fair Lady?  Pygmalion.  Want films about children that will put a knife through your heart? Forbidden Games and The Spirit of the Beehive should do it.  Want films about old men that will do the same?  Umberto D and Ikiru.  Want to enter an entirely-realized but alien world for an hour and a half? Ugetsu and Beauty and the Beast.  Want some batshit crazy images to play in the background of your next Halloween party?  Häxan.  Finally, did you, like me, love Gregory's Girl and Billy Liar growing up?  Check out Il Posto - you'll thank me later.

Film review: Miss Julie (1951)


This is it - film number 50 from our 50-film box set of "Classic Art House" movies, which I will get to next.  For basically the last ten, the films have been ones that I (or Jami, although she opted out of watching the last couple) have put off, expecting them to be a drag, and for all the others I've been pleasantly surprised.  However, I have to say that I made the right call with this one.  I found the characters unlikeable, which is not necessarily a strike against the film (or play, as it's an adaptation of a Strindberg play of the same name) if you could empathize with them to some extent, but they're also both a little bit crazy (well, Julie in particular is) and the products of systems that I never really encountered and about which I do not care (in the same way that watching The Crown holds zero appeal to me).  Basically it's a two-hander (except for flashbacks) of Julie, who is the troubled (and how!) daughter of a Count, and Jean, who is the Count's sort-of lead servant/Butler, whom Julie appears to be obsessed with.  



Both characters are both attracted and repelled by the other, her sense of exalted stature and his resentment against same definitely causing most of the conflict.  But also she was the product of a "modern" (I think the play is set either in or not long after Napoleonic times, because there's a painting on the wall of him and he is referred to as "The Emperor") union, or rather, mother, who not only refused to marry the Count (being perfectly willing to be his mistress, but he had eyes only for her), but laughed insanely (there's a fair amount of that in this, which always takes me out of a film) when she produced a daughter instead of the Count's longed-for son, but then, out of "progressive" motivations, insisted that her daughter be dressed and raised as a son (and that all the women on the estate do the man's work, and vice versa - cue humorous montages of each sex failing disastrously at their allotted tasks), until at last The Count intervenes and allows her to be a girl, and to have a doll (with the strange name "Blenda"), something the mother resents to the extent that it almost causes Julie's death.  I don't know how you can come out of the film without seeing the mother as the villain and a large part of Julie's troubles to be caused by her cross-gendered childhood, although I see that this play is supposed to have a feminist message (because of Julie's occasional outbursts against men - wishing they would all drown in a pool of blood, for example?).  I don't see it.  The only message I get is "everything is awful and people are selfish shits".

I will say that the setting, of Midsummer's Eve celebrations and the long daylit night over which the play takes place, is very engrossing, and the camera work, although jarring in places (the director loves ZOOMING in on a character's face), at least adventurous.  In fact the film looks a lot more modern than the content - it's as if it's being pulled to the future by the one and the past by the other.

Adding to the cruelty is that Jean seems to be two-faced, telling Julie he loved her as a poor child visiting the estate (when he first meets her he is reeking of shit because he's had to escape an outside lavatory through the toilet) and then later saying that was all made up.  He also veers between lust and disdain, and then occasionally is quite sincere with her, so that he appears almost as unstable as she does.  There are also moments when characters (okay, it's pretty much always Julie) stare into the middle distance and say portentous things about life, and I was vividly reminded of Groucho doing the same to much more enjoyable effect (and probably spoofing Strindberg or Ibsen, or those influenced by them [edit: apparently Eugene O'Neil, specifically Strange Interlude]).  Probably the person I feel for most is the Count, who seems a genuinely decent fellow (his servants all seem to like him, although his effect on Jean of unconsciously making him servile is one of the things Jean resents most) and who loved his strange wife and adores his strange daughter, right to the tragic end.  The film won at Cannes and I can see why the French would love it, and love the ending.  But it left me with an appreciation for Bergman's sense of humor, would you believe. 

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Flint from the 11th Floor

 ..of the Northbank Center, where I record my video lectures.  I go there the evening before to write everything on the board, and when I take a break...







Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Rainy reset

It's been warm (up into the 50s) and it actually rained today (in February!) to wash all but the most stubborn remaining snow away.  People are emerging and finally removing their outdoor Xmas lights that it was too cold to bother with previously.  And now... fog!














 

Friday, February 13, 2026

Frozen Lake Follies

As Frederick hasn't felt up to going for walks lately, I haven't got to do a favorite winter activity of mine, which is walking on frozen lakes.  And as temps in the 50s are forecast in the next few days, it seemed like now might be the last wise time to try.  So I went for a little jaunt at Holly Rec.









 A couple of those (notably the selfie) were taken when my phone suddenly decided to drop to 3% power and dim the screen to the point where it was unreadable (apparently it can't stand the cold) so I couldn't see what I was taking.  Here's me crossing the lake:


 

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Film review: Father Brown/The Detective (1954)


Well, this is a British film from the 50s, so guess who's the first actor you see in it?  If you guessed Sid James, you've been paying attention.  He is fleeing down the stairs of some sort of factory at night as Police climb them and somehow he manages to avoid them and get out to safety.  When the police get to their destination, which appears to be the payroll office, the shine their lights around and reveal Alec Guinness's Father Brown calmly replacing stacks of bills in the safe.  Nonetheless they arrest him and take him to the station 


and put him in a cell, after first emptying his pockets (he asks for his bar of chocolate, because he hasn't eaten) and taking his glasses, leaving him squinting like Mr. Magoo.  After some calls to other stations, looking for info on conmen who pose as priests (largely because the arresting officer refuses to believe he's really called "Brown" - although his first name is the much less prosaic "Ignatius"), they find somebody who knows of him because of his status as an amateur detective, and he is released, bearing them no animus.  In fact, very rarely do we see Father Brown betray annoyance (so that on the one occasion I remember, it's rather shocking), at most he is disappointed.  When he gets out, Sid James is there to meet him.  As we might have guessed, Father Brown worked out where Bert Parkinson (Sid's character) would be operating and talked him out of it.  As they walk together by the canal, Father Brown talks Bert into going straight, specifically as a chauffeur for a "friend of mine."  This turns out to be Lady Warren, played by Joan "posher-sounding Glynis Johns" Greenwood, 


who was also paired with Guinness in The Man in the White Suit.  (Another fellow Ealing Comedy castmate of Guinness's, Cecil Parker (who plays the first of The Ladykillers to lose his nerve and get bumped off) shows up as Father Brown's Bishop.)  Anyway, the main plot of the film concerns Father Brown's pursuit of notorious thief Flambeau, played by Peter Finch, whom I only knew for his final, Oscar-winning role in Network ("I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!") but who is wonderful here, underplaying nicely and managing a believable French accent.

The initial battle is over a thousand-year-old cross (I think he says it was St. Augustine's) that needs to be sent to Rome.  The church is convinced that Flambeau will try to take it, so make plans to send it under armed guard.  Father Brown thinks this is ridiculous, and because "the best place to hide a leaf is in a forest" he suggests that a priest should carry it, as vast numbers of clergy are descending on Rome, and Flambeau won't know who has it.  When he gets overruled, Father Brown takes the cross anyway.  This is his first time outside of England, and he commiserates with a fellow priest on the very rough ferry ride.  They ride on together to Paris, where the other priest shows him around, having served on a mission or something there.  They are being followed by a team of an English policeman and a French, as it has been discovered that Father Brown has the cross.  As this will attract unwanted attention, Father Brown and the other priest (who spot the cops as they're eating at a cafe) 


escape on a bus and then down into the Catacombs... where Father Brown calls the other priest Flambeau, for of course it is he (under a fake goatee).  Where he went wrong, Father Brown reveals, is in ordering a ham sandwich at the cafe, as I think it is Friday.  Flambeau takes the parcel Father Brown is carrying, at which FB smugly says that he switched parcels and left the real crucifix back at the cafe.  Then Flambeau opens the parcel to reveal the crucifix and says he switched them back.  Then he ties up FB, changes clothes and limps out of the Catacombs, taking time to report to the cops that have followed them that he heard a disturbance at [revealing FB's location, so he wont have to stay tied up].  Of course FB is in huge hot water for disobeying orders and causing the loss of the crucifix, but FB is confident he can set things right.  And to do so he convinces Lady Warren to set a trap by auctioning a priceless chess set, because he knows Flambeau won't be able to resist it.

Father Brown does indeed catch Flambeau (seeing through another of his disguises because of another "ham sandwich"-style mistake) but (a) Flambeau returns the chess set (clearly taken with Lady Warren) 


and (b) FB helps him escape, for which he gets into more hot water.  BUT, he has a clue: he lifted Flambeau's cigarette case (it's revealed early in the film that he has the skills of an "oyster" which apparently was slang for pickpocket - he has also shown that he is a good wrestler) 


which has his family crest on it, so the first thing to do is return to Paris to a repository of French Heraldry.  


Will FB catch Flambeau?  Why does Flambeau steal (and then sometimes return it)?  Both times FB and Flambeau have encountered each other, they have been studiously polite, but Flambeau has become annoyed at FB's attempts to reform him.  He reveals that he steals because he is a man out of time: he has skills (as a fencer, as a horseman) that are obsolete, and tastes that he cannot afford to satiate, so he steals so he can have beautiful things.  Well, he's in for a real scolding if FB catches him again...

As with the books, one can enjoy the character and the story without being too nauseated by the gentle Catholic Propaganda (in this way it reminds me of the Don Camillo stories).  Alec Guinness is in prime Ealing Era comedic chameleon mode (with a very unfortunate haircut), which the part calls for, but which allows Peter Finch, who has a genuinely poignant edge to his performance, to more-or-less steal the picture.  As Jami remarked, it was more like a TV show than a proper film, but that's true of a lot of British cinema, particularly in the 50s, but all the performances are good, at least.  I'd certainly watch more of Guinness-as-Brown, so it's rather a shame there aren't any more.