It's Carter Dickson again with one of his favorite heroes, Sir Henry Merrivale (H.M. to friends--and when did he become a "Sir"? The cost of reading these out of order is that I don't know his story arc), who is acting as an advisor to the London's Metropolitan Police. (He wears many hats.) It goes without saying that this is one of those locked room mysteries though a non-standard one--it even features a lecture by H.M. telling us that there are three canonical categories of "locked room mysteries" and this one isn't any of those but a "whole new breed of locked room mysteries"! Good to have Dickson instruct us to admire his ingenuity through the voice of his most popular character. This was published in 1937 and is set in that period, but troubles in Europe are never mentioned. What is mentioned frequently is the dramatic class change taking place in London at that time--and no one is happy about it.. [That complaint featured in one of the mysteries by Lorac I reviewed in an earlier blog (with the Scottish Scotland Yard detetective MacDonald), too, so it must have been a big part of the zeitgeist then.] Here all the characters mention that fantastically gorgeous Victorian homes have been abandoned, have been sittting empty for years, and are going to ruin. Meanwhile their "back buildings" which face nearby streets (stables, servant houses, carriage houses and so on) are being converted to single family homes and, since those 4, 5 or even larger person families are shoved into tiny buildings, the implication is clear that they are of a lower class and so likely criminal. Pollution is a theme, too: the old, empty houses are covered in dust to the point that you can't see inside them even with your face pressed up against the glass and the empty streets they line look haunted. Meanwhile the newly occupied "back building" houses are grimy, cheaply renovated by shyster landlords and are predicted to be in a shambles before long. WORSE the city is building the underground and setting up stops RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF FORMERLY WEALTHY STREETS! Imagine the idea of people who use the underground walking around previously wealthy neighborhoods! It doesn't bear thinking about, really. Another theme: the awfulness of police not being allowed to carry guns even though the "Lord Minister knows damned well the criminals have guns--probably bought from Americans!!".
So this story starts with us meeting a competant albeit loud Chief Inspector Humphrey Masters in his office, sitting at his desk, harrumphing to his side kick, Sergeant Pollard, about his latest large headache: he received an odd letter in the mail which instructs him to be at Number 18 Pendragon Gardens on April 30th at 9:30 pm. It also states there will be "ten teacups". While certainly odd on its face we find out that it connects back to a notorious unsolved murder from two years earlier, when the police were also sent a letter that instructed them to be at a different address on a specific date at a specific time where there would be 10 teacups. And (rather unbelievably) the police had staked out the house--seeing no one go in or out--then heard gunshots and found a dead body inside an entirely empty (abandoned) house except for a small table with 10 tea cups arranged in a perfect circle on the table. The man, a guy named Dartley who matters not a jot for our story other than that he was killed in a locked room, had been shot twice in the back of the head. And, stranger still, these tea cups were no ordinary teacups--they were hundreds of years old, covered in gold and worth (in 1937 money) £2,500! Obviously robbery wasn't the motive. So if no one was in the building and no one got in or out and (of course) the room was locked from the inside at the time of the murder, how was it done? The mystery was too much for everyone and thus it stayed unsolved. And now, it seems, that same crazed murderer is up to his hijinks again!
At this point, when Masters instructs Pollard to get a hold of Merrivale, we leave the police station and bob in and out of homes to meet various characters that figure in our story:
1. Vance Keating: Our next murder victim. A young man who is a bit of a blowhard, likes to drink and smoke with his male friends and seduce and drop his women friends. His main vice (and ultimate Achilles heel) is that he is certain he is more clever than everyone else. (All together, say "Nobody's smart but me!" in a Rumplestiltskin voice ala Shrek 4.)
2. Frances Gale: Vance's girlfriend/fiancee/wife (depending on who you talk to). Does she love him? Well, not really, but she loves the idea of being loved. Does Vance love her? No, not at all. Does she know that? Yes. She's the kind of female that gets extremely angry, stamps her foot, and storms off when being questioned by police.
3. Philip Keating: Vance's dull cousin: Philip parties less hard and less frequently than Vance does, works more, gambles less, invests more and, generally, watches Vance get all the attention from the sidelines. Philip and Vance both rent rooms in the same apartment building and are in and out of each other's apartments all the time, borrowing things and eavesdropping on secret conversations. They fight, then get drunk, and then forgive each other--or do they?
4. Ronald Gardner: A friend of both Keating boys, a gun collector (!!), a bit of a shit-stirrer, and desperately pining for Frances Gale. Does she love him? Not in the slightest. In fact, she's pretty damned rude to him at every opportunity.
5. Mr. and Mrs. Derwent: Mr. Derwent is an elderly, retired lawyer who married unwisely. His skin and voice are papery but his mind is sharp--even though his much younger (but by no means young) wife tells everyone who will listen to her that his "mind wanders terribly". He doesn't love his wife (and perhaps never did) but he puts up with her for no obvious reason. Mrs. Derwent is described as being "curvy" "fulsome" "voluptuous" and "large". She wears low cut dresses and has an unrealistic pile of surprisingly blonde hair "for someone her age". She acts (and sometimes speaks) like a baby, but can also have a frightening glint in her eye. She's also someone who thinks she's smarter than everyone else. She's the character that screams, faints and then surrounds herself with forceful doctors to avoid talking to police. She wants to have a torrid affair with Vance and he wants to have a torrid affair with her--the problem is that both are so busy trying to take advantage of the other financially, that the torrid affair never happens.
6. Elder Mr. Soar and Young Mr Soar: The owners of a massive premier art and auction house. They specialize in acquiring valuable items illegally and passing them on to people with a clean title. Soar senior was also in the blackmailing business which is why he met an untimely end before the events in this book. Young Soar claims he wants to "run a straight business" but is burdened with hundreds of documents collected by his father that reveal all sorts of crimes and misdemeanors of wealthy and influential people. He denies their existence but those in the know know that he has many, many hiding places inside objets d'art.
7. Alfred Bartlet, Vance's valet: This guy is extremely old and is always peeking into rooms so he can hear what is being said. But he's also closed-lipped and gives the police the bare minimum when answering their questions, thereby leaving out a LOT of important information--which is going to cost him.
8. W. G. Hawkins, another servant of Vance's: He's less old, less curious and therefore out of danger. But he also knows nothing and advances the case not at all.
There is a whole slew of police officers that we meet so we can hear phrases like "Lord love a duck!" but they aren't individuals and so I won't get into them.
Two events that occur before Vance's murder are worth mentioning:
(1) On Monday afternoon, Vance and Gardner are messing around in Vance's apartment with one of Gardner's guns, a western style (American) "shooter" that has a "hair trigger" and needs to be cocked before it is fired each time. And, because Vance is a putz, he loses control of the gun and it fires wildly knocking the tray of drinks Hawkins was bringing to them. The gun did not have bullets in it but blanks, yet it needs "wadding" to fire and the wadding (which can be just as deadly if fired close enough to a person) was what knocked the tray and smashed the glasses. This is significant because it tells us about Vance's character (that he's a putz) and that Gardner's gun is deadly dangerous even if it doesn't have bullets in it.
(2) On Tuesday evening, the Derwents have a "murder" party and all those mentioned above who are not servants are invited. The idea is that, once it is dark out, they turn out all the lights and one person who is "the murderer" has to find and tap a person with a murder "weapon". Then, the victim waits to a count of 20 or something and screams, and then lays on the floor "dead." Vance is supposed to go and is intended to be the "murderer." But just hours before the party is set to start he calls Frances and tells her he won't be going, but won't give a reason. Three weapons are placed on the mantle--a paper "knife" covered with aluminum foil, a string shaped into a "noose," and Gardner's gun with blanks in it. A new murderer is appointed but the party is a drag and everyone leaves early claiming they have headaches. Everyone sees the gun on the mantle up to 11:00 pm and then after that point no one sees the gun on the mantle. Since that's the time people are getting coats on and saying their goodbyes, everyone assumes Ronald has collected his gun when he was leaving. Ronald later claims he was too drunk to think about it and so didn't collect it and had no idea where it ended up.
That brings us to Wednesday afternoon: the police surround the appointed "10 teacup house" (they want to catch the would-be murderer, not merely prevent a murder) and watch as Vance goes inside with a song in his heart and a spring in his step. This house, too, is abandoned and empty except for a few items of furniture that were delivered earlier in the day. Watching and waiting, the police see no one else enter. Then, at precisely 9:30, a gun is fired, they hear a scream, and then a second shot is fired. They race in and AGAIN find a locked room. They burst in and see pretty much the identical scene they saw when they found Dartley's corpse a few years ago: Vance's dead body on the floor with two bullet holes in the back of his neck, a small table with a fancy (and extremely expensive) gold silk cloth on it and 10 teacups on that. One chair at the table and a divan off to the side, under a window. And there on the floor, next to Vance, is Gardner's gun last seen on the Derwent's mantle the night before.
Well! Needless to say the police are stumped. Even H.M is stumped! Then the bulk of the rest of the book is spent getting to know these rather unlikable people while seemingly getting no closer to solving the riddle: everyone has an alibi and, anyway, no one could have gotten into the room or left after the murder without the police seeing them! And what does Vance have to do with Dartley anyway? It looks very much like another Dartley embarrassment for the police of London. THEN Masters gets a third letter, again, telling him to be at a certain house at a certain time and to plan to see, you guessed it, 10 teacups. Now it looks like the murderer is just toying with the police. So, once again, we have the same set up: an abandoned house surrounded by police hiding in bushes, covering all exits and entrances. Then, later that afternoon Young Mr. Soar enters the building. (Why would he do that given all everyone knows about the Ten Teacups?) After dark, but before 9:30, another person enters the backdoor. Then a THIRD person enters the backdoor just seconds before 9:30 pm. So the police rush the house and find Mr. Soar alive and well, talking with Mr Dermant. They don't like each other, but each has information the other wants. Both seem completely stymied to see the police, claiming (a) neither knows anything about a "third person", (b) there have been no gun shots, and (c) no one has killed anyone and no one has been killed.
Well, unsurprisingly, the police aren't buying that and search the house stem to stern--tapping on walls, pulling up loose floor boards and checking loose wallpaper. NOTHING! Until, one police officer finds a freshly bloodied knife wrapped up in newspaper and shoved into a crevice between baseboards. Ok, that looks bad...but where is the corpse?
So everyone significant assembles in the almost empty parlor: there are two chairs, both covered with white sheets and a small table. No tea cups. Masters, Pollard and H.M. stand about taking turns asking questions. Soar sits on one chair and Derwent on the other. Eventually all sorts of secrets come out but nothing that brings them closer to solving any of the murders. One point of interest, though, is that as Derwent reveals all his sordid secrets, he gets calmer and (seemingly) more at ease--like the weight of the world is lifting. But Soar gets sweatier and sweatier, until his eyes are wildly darting about and he's fidgeting madly. Finally he jumps up screaming, "I can't take it anymore!", pulls the sheet off the "chair" he's been sitting on and reveals the fresh corpse (secured into a chair shape with ropes and boards) of Hawkins who had been stabbed to death.
Well! Does that mean Soar killed Dartley, Vance and Hawkins? Nope. Did he kill any of them? Nope. So who did? Well, that's so complicated and bizarre you just have to read it for yourself. And, as with all Dickson books, make sure you take copious notes as you do.
[This time Dickson does us the favor of footnoting previous pages that prove we were told all the relevant facts we need to solve the murders ourselves. The book ends with H.M. explaining everything, as he always does, to Pollard and Masters as they sit in his favorite pub having a drink and a large meal. Every time H.M. says, "And when XX said YY..." there is the footnote number referring us to the page on which that character said exactly that. Dickson said he was accused so many times of making up facts to support impossible solutions that he started this footnote system to prove to people that, if they simply weren't so stupid, then could figure out the "mysteries", too.]






















